Home
Chelation Story
Chelation Regimen
Oral Chelation Supplement
Chelation Recommendations
EDTA IV Chelation
EDTA Oral Chelation
Chelation Studies
My Chelation Blog
Circulation Symptoms
Circulation and Heart Disease
EDTA Chelation Users Say
Heavy Metals
Anti Aging Super Food
Antioxidants
Diet and Super Foods
Exercise
About Me & Contact
Nutrition & Vitamin Store
Site Map
Article Directory

 

 
Add to Google
Add to My Yahoo!

Add to My AOL  
Add to Technorati Favorites!

 

 

 

  Effect of EDTA Chelation Therapy Plus
Multi-vitamin/Trace Mineral Supplementation Upon Vascular Dynamics

E.W. McDonagh, DO, C.J. Rudolph, DO, and E. Cheraskin, MD, DMD

Dr. E.W. McDonagh is founder of the McDonagh Medical Center in Gladstone, Missouri, where he practices with Dr. C..J. Rudolph. Dr. E. Cheraskin is Professor Emeritus and former Chairman of the Department of Oral Medicine at the University of Alabama.

ABSTRACT: A study of 117 lower extremities in 77 elderly patients with documented occlusive peripheral vascular stenosis, diagnosed by the Doppler systolic ankle/brachial (ankle/arm) blood pressure ratio is reported. This study showed that intravenous ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) chelation therapy with supportive multivitamin/trace mineral supplementation improved arterial blood flow to the legs significantly after approximately 60 days and 26 infusions (P<0.001).

[Note: Blood pressure is normally higher in the ankles than in the arms. An A/B ratio of less than approximately 1.0 is considered abnormal and is an indication of blockage to the flow of blood to the legs]

  Effect of EDTA Chelation Therapy with Vitamin/Mineral Supplementation 
upon Ankle-Brachial Systolic Pressure

All Patients Sample Size Ankle/Brachial
Pressure
Mean Percentage Change Significance of the
Difference of the Means
1 initial
2 final
117
117
0.77±0.22
0.94±0.17

+ 22%

t=8.0041     P<0.001*
         
Lower (poorer) patients, initial A/B ratio less than 0.80
3 initial
4 final
46
46
0.55±0.19
0.71±0.25

+ 29%

t=3.9771     P<0.001*
         
Higher (better) patients, initial A/B ratio greater than 0.80
5 initial
6 final
71
71
0.91±0.06
1.08±0.17

+ 19%

t=8.9790     P<0.001*
 

*statistically significant difference of the means

Journal of Advancement in Medicine Volume 2, Numbers 1/2, Spring/Summer 1989
For the full-text study, go to your nearest medical library or order

 

 

Send this information to a friend

Copyright © 1992/1997/2004 GO4IT Marketing Group & Dan & Lana Keating All rights reserved.
Information in this document is subject to change without notice.
Last modified: December 18, 2008